They generally work to make it so that particles (i.e. is it an energy source? what the flip is it? What does it do? or, what would it have done had it not shut down. Find a more neutral source - not an anti-government spending libertarian think tank. on a government project that was shutdown due to budgetary concerns. I don't think we should be citing the Cato Inst. Just a retarded question: why does the article Clinton undermined the project for banal partisan reasons, when the only reliable sources quoted say that he supported the project as a way of continuing to demonstrate US science leadership? Jack-z ( talk) 23:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC) Reply Comment I'd love to fix this in the first paragraph, but it's not open for me to edit. There was no other SSC Lab or CDG director between Tigner and Schwitters. Roy Schwitters became the director instead. Maury Tigner, the director of the Reference Design Study and director of the Central Design Group was in line as the first SSC Lab director, but resigned beforehand. He was a Department of Energy civil servant and served as Acting Associate Director of the Office of the SSC in the Forestal building in Washington DC.

For example, Louis Ianniello was never Project Director of the SSC Laboratory. I worked in the SSC Central Design Group for a few years and have first-hand knowledge of some of this. I agree, a lot of the info is incorrect or missing. I hope to go back soon and take notes for posting on this page, if I can get permission from the Smithsonian i'll post pictures from there as well. I visited the Smithsonian American History Museum yesterday and there was a good size section on the SSC, their info cited and some listed here: conflicts with alot of the info on this page!!!!!

Tribe supercollider